- #FABFILTER TIMELESS CRASHES LOGIC PRO X UPDATE#
- #FABFILTER TIMELESS CRASHES LOGIC PRO X UPGRADE#
- #FABFILTER TIMELESS CRASHES LOGIC PRO X FREE#
#FABFILTER TIMELESS CRASHES LOGIC PRO X FREE#
Just to clarify for the previous poster, free routing does not exist a la pro tools. Mixer - terrible vs PT- looks, functionality, sends and inserts visible at the same time etc.īetter on board plugins - delay - terrible for instance company paradigm that I felt with AVID… and to me, these issues are something to consider when chosing a product you will use every day.
#FABFILTER TIMELESS CRASHES LOGIC PRO X UPDATE#
Steiny may not update Cubase quite as quickly as something like Reaper, but they are still faster at fixing major bugs than some. I was very unhappy with all the crashes I was getting with the 6.03 update, but I was very satisfied with the 6.04 update. I think they try to make products as useful ‘out-of-the-box’ as they can, and continue to make updates after, which aren’t attempts at capitalizing on my needs. Cubase does pretty much everything I need, and I don’t feel steinberg is trying to invent ways to take my money.
#FABFILTER TIMELESS CRASHES LOGIC PRO X UPGRADE#
I looked over the new features in PT 10, and forking over $250 for an upgrade from 8 seems stupid to me. However, I won’t be suckered into an upgrade because the hype says it’s the latest and greatest. I may upgrade PT in the distant future if I have projects I need to work in that I can’t do otherwise, and I’m getting paid enough for the projects to do that. Everytime I’ve tried dealing with DIGI/AVID it’s always amounted to the same thing-> money drain in order to pay for extras. Why would I pay extra to ‘modernize’ PT, when I could upgrade another program that’s already had the features I need, and is looking forward instead of just ‘keeping-up’?Ĭubase may have some issues, as every program… BUT, I think Steinberg is more on the customer’s side than AVID ever will be. ‘New Features’ in PT9, were standard features in almost every single other DAW, including the other program I was using before all this. I opted to upgrade my Cubase instead, and gave AVID the finger (after quite a bit of back and forth with AVID’s customer service). However, in order to get a fully useable system, AVID was asking me to fork over more money in upgrades to PT9 (which came out the exact day I got the MBox I ordered a few weeks before, that shipped with version 8) than what upgrading my old S元 version of cubase would cost me.Įnd result I was suckered in once again, and had the same experience with ProTools that I had when I first bought it 6 years ago… buying into the whole ‘industry standard’ BS, and realizing later that I would need to spend an extra ton of cash right off, to get a system that works the way I need.
Short version the hardware is great, and worth the money I paid for it IMO. I’m not going to go into the whole story, because it’s kind of lengthy. So, I was lured in, and I decided to buy the new MBox. This was at the same time they anounced the new 3rd gen MBox line. I took a look, and thought ProTools had evolved a lot, and I would make the switch back to ProTools.
Then, after years of working with only digital music composition, I needed to get into some ProTools projects to work on a couple projects. I had been using another program entirely as my main DAW.
0 kommentar(er)
